A U.S. appeals court has ruled that a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling is unconstitutional.[4]
If you want, tell me your state (or whether you’re asking as a hobbyist, business, or policy issue) and I can summarize what this likely means in practice.
A U.S. appeals court today declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for Congress to exercise its power to tax.
ground.newsA U.S. appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for Congress to exercise its power to tax. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled in favor of the nonprofit Hobby Distillers Association and four of its 1,300 members.
ground.newsA federal appeals court has struck down the nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling, declaring the Reconstruction-era prohibition an unconstitutional overreach of Congress’ taxing authority.
www.washingtontimes.comA U.S. appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old federal ban on home distilling.
thedailyrecord.comUS News is a recognized leader in college, grad school, hospital, mutual fund, and car rankings. Track elected officials, research health conditions, and find news you can use in politics, business, health, and education.
www.usnews.comAn appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a nearly 158-year-old ban on home distilling, calling it an unnecessary and improper means for Congress to tax the public.
www.ksl.comLate last night, after months of litigation, a federal court in Texas decided the federal ban on at-home distillation of beverage spirits is unconstitutional. The district court’s decision is fair; it is correct on the law; and it is historic. Lawyers at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) represent several amateur home-distilling enthusiasts who want to […]
cei.org